Forty percent of traffic accidents in the country involve drivers who drink alcohol before driving | National Magazine

Forty percent of traffic accidents in the country involve drivers who drink alcohol before driving. On Thursday (19), a The Federal Supreme Court has decided that alcohol consumption will have zero tolerance for those who take the wheel and that those who refuse to take an alcohol test will be punished..

A family mourned. Father and mother are unhappy about the death of their son, 23-year-old Vinicius Luan. At the beginning of the month, a drunk driver broke into the track the young man was riding on a motorbike in Sealandia, Federal District. The driver refused to immediately take a breathalyzer test, but the IML confirmed that he was intoxicated.

The driver was arrested, bailed and then released. Vinicius Luan was in a coma for nine days and died this week.

“Your son is leaving and never coming back. When you get news like this, a car from a drunk man, the man gets drunk, takes a car and goes to the street. It’s a drunk man in a car, that’s a weapon,” says Zenildo Silva dos Anjos, father of Vinicius Luan.

The Federal Supreme Court, Thursday (19), ruled in three cases that questioned the constitutionality of the ban law in force since 2008 and amended in 2012.

In one case, the Rio Grande do Sul Court of Justice overturned a ticket for a driver who refused to take a breathalyzer test. TJ realized that rejection in and of itself did not prove drunk. The Supreme Court unanimously overturned the decision.

The ministers decided that the penalty stipulated in the Prohibition Law for those who refuse to detonate the alcohol meter is a constitutional penalty and that refusing to undergo the test does not constitute a crime, but can be punished by administrative measures.

STF has also maintained a zero tolerance for alcohol consumption by those who drive. Therefore, exactly what is stipulated in the law continues to apply. Who refuses to take a breathalyzer test?:

Loss of the right to drive for 12 months;

– you have to pay a fine of about 3 thousand Brazilian riyals for the violation – which is very dangerous – and you get seven points in your wallet;

– retain the vehicle and driver’s licence;

Penalties also apply to the driver who refuses to undergo clinical or expert examinations to determine the possible use of psychoactive substances while driving.

The head of the STF, Minister Luiz Fux, emphasized during the trial that the Prohibition Act was necessary to combat accidents caused by alcohol use and that the law had contributed to reducing traffic fatalities. The decision of the plenary session has general implications, that is, it will be applied to all similar cases that are dealt with in court.

For Unicamp professor and transportation specialist Creso de Franco Peixoto, the ministers’ decision strengthens the ban law and provides more safety for customers and police officers working in the field, but advocates stepping up inspections.

“The Federal Supreme Court certifies that it’s a hit, and it ended, in a more popular way, so that we can put it, it helps. But, in my opinion, it does not happen. We will have to campaign more intensely. The monetary resources for this have, and the human resources as well. And after So, I think we can have a new phase of creating fear in those who know they can’t drink and who insist, and who think, “I’m used to drinking,” he says.

The director of inspection at DeTran in Brasilia says the STF’s decision helps dispel the myth that refusing to take a breath analyzer is a way to escape the law.

“This Supreme Court decision endorses and certifies the inspection procedures that are carried out in Brazil. It is very important that we have effective rules to combat alcohol-related violence in traffic. Alcohol while driving remains one of the leading causes of death in Brazil,” says Glauber Peixoto. , director of traffic inspection at DeTran/DF.

In addition to the high fine and penalties stipulated in the ban, heavy drinkers and driving may have to take responsibility for causing an irreparable void.

“He took everything, everything, that driver. What did he do? She took our son’s life, out of ours,” says Vinicius Luan’s mother, Vinicius Luan.

Leave a Comment